|
Depicting
nature
is not seen or classified as "contemporary art". Highly Realistic
Natural Art may also be considered "passé" (From Wikipedia)
"Old-fashioned can refer to retro and outdated fashions, trends,
music, and other activities or genres".
These
sculptures have had a rather inglorious acceptance in the Australian Contemporary
Glass world which I find amusing as we are surrounded by coral reefs.
Depiction's of nature is normally tame and not thought provoking but does
art always have to test us can it not be for the sake of pleasure or beauty?
Thankfully
I got a completely positive response with the right people particularly
in France and Venice (Murano) who live and breath Art Glass, it certainly
does help to get positive feedback from ones peers.
Once
it was impossible to sell abstraction's and call it Art yet now we are
blind to anything which is not absolutely out there, bizarre, obscene
or considered ground breaking i.e. "contemporary". It is purely
natural for an artist to be influenced by the great abstractionist's of
the past who changed the art world forever yet bring up Lalique and you
may be defined as a fossil.
Why
you never saw these works in any major specialised glass gallery in Australia
is because they were not deemed to be "contemporary art" or
"not fit in with the style" of the gallery. This is where the
so called decorative arts and the critics who control what you the viewing
public sees must be brought into question. There I have had my say, you
work it out maybe, am I just another winging artist?
So
much for being in a backwater and as far as I am concerned breaking new
ground as I have never seen work similar to this style. These sculptures
certainly succeeded in helping me learn something about casting glass. |